The question of Biofuels in environment saftey

Backlash Erupts Over Biofuels as Food Costs Rise
Maybe ethanol isn’t the answer after all, as both fuel and corn prices keep going up.

By . Agence France-Presse

May 9, 2008 -- A biofuels backlash has erupted throughout the United States, as lawmakers and experts debate the merits of converting food to fuel to support America's age-old love affair with the automobile.

With gasoline at record prices at U.S. pumps, and soaring corn, rice and wheat costs sparking a global food crisis this year with deadly riots in several nations, some have questioned the wisdom of higher U.S. biofuel mandates that divert U.S. crops, like corn, to fuel production.

"Why are we putting food in our gas tanks instead of our stomachs?" Richard Reinwald, owner of Reinwald's Bakery in Huntington, New York, asked members of Congress at a hearing last week on skyrocketing food costs.

Biofuels are derived from foodstuffs such as corn, soybeans and sugarcane, and plants like switch grass and their cellulosic waste.

Touted just months ago as an answer to spiking gas prices, biofuels are enduring closer scrutiny by U.S. lawmakers alarmed by the high cost of food staples and how they are sapping millions of American households.

Members of Bush's own Republican party are turning on him, including Senator Kay Bailey Hutchison, who called on Congress to undo "America's ethanol mistake."

"In recent weeks, the correlation between government biofuel mandates and rapidly rising food prices has become undeniable," Senator Kay Bailey Hutchison (R-Tex.) said in a statement on her website. "At a time when the U.S. economy is facing recession, Congress needs to reform its food-to-fuel policies and look at alternatives to strengthen energy security."

Hutchison is due to introduce legislation to Congress that would freeze biofuel mandates at current levels.

Biofuels are refined to produce fuel similar to those made from petroleum, but their growing use has been cited along with poor harvests due to drought, surging demand in Asia as living standards have risen, higher transport costs and trade restrictions for the rapid rise in food prices.
Joachim von Braun, head of the U.S.-based International Food Policy Research Institute, said a moratorium on biofuels from food grains in 2008 would lower corn prices by 20% and wheat prices by 10% in 2009 and 2010.

The United States is the world's top producer of corn-based ethanol, and the Bush administration sees it as a key way to reduce dependence on foreign oil and curb fossil fuel emissions, the main source of man-made global warming.

Some scientists warn that biofuels actually increase greenhouse gas emissions, as farmers convert forest and grassland to new cropland to replace or add to grain diverted to biofuels.

"Corn-based ethanol, instead of producing a 20% savings, nearly doubles greenhouse emissions over 30 years, and increases greenhouse gases for 167 years," Timothy Searchinger and other experts wrote in a study published in the journal Science.

Yet scores of American farmers eyeing swelling corn prices have abandoned wheat to grow corn, leading to the lowest U.S. wheat ending stocks in 60 years, according to the US Department of Agriculture, and causing a ripple effect of rising commodity prices.

Copyright Agence France-Presse, 2008

Bio fuels or food habits

Friday, May 09, 2008

Bio fuels, not Indian food habits escalate food prices


Mumbai: Minister of State for External affairs feel that diversion of food grain and encouraging it by diversion is the reason behind price hike. "Diversion of food grain for bio-fuels and encouraging it by subsidising such diversion is the primary reason if not the exclusive reason for rising food grain prices all over the world", said Minister of State for External Affairs Anand Sharma.

He was speaking at the round table conference organised by FICCI on 'Foreign policy-Implications for Indian Business'. Perhaps for the first time in sharp response to US president George Bush's statement, "India and China are causing rise in the food prices", from the senior government functionary Sharma said, "issue of the bio-fuels must be addressed very carefully and it should be ensured that, it doesn't threatens the food security".

The food grains which are diverted for bio-fuels may not be the staple diet for rich and affluent countries but they are part of staple diet for millions and millions of people in many poor countries. And one must understand issue of food security is also linked with health security, he added.

Another important factor, which is causing rise in the food prices, all over the world is the rising oil prices, as today's agriculture is energy intensive and also dependent on fertilisers, which is also a petroleum product, he pointed out.

Later speaking with media persons on the future of Indo-US nuclear deal he virtually admitted that, nuclear deal is dead and buried by saying "I won't like to use such a harsh words and dialogue and consensus between two sovereign nations don't get affected by the change in the dispersion".

Even if there is a change of government in the United States after the elections, it won't disturb basic understanding between two countries on civil nuclear deal, he expressed confidence. Defending governments dilly-dally approach over the nuclear deal Sharma said, "we are living in an era of coalition politics and it is necessary to build larger consensus on such an important issue at home before, we sign a treaty with another country.

Source: Business Standard